Category Self improvement and motivation

Plos one research paper

Posted on by CORIE M.

Submit reviewCreate academic journal list

Reviews just for "PLoS ONE"

PLoS ONE6.1
weeks
12.6
weeks
n/a32
(moderate)
1
(bad)
Rejected2019
Motivation: Reviewer 1 stated pieces of paper appeared to be awesome and even should really turn out to be published
Reviewer Only two required just for clarifications plus improvements
Reviewer 3 wrote a strong illegible, very undesirable analyze and even evidently do possibly not currently have acceptable english dialect techniques that will figure out this cardstock.

Ready that will Present a Exploration towards PLOS?

Furthermore questioned intended for trials the fact that might be ethically doubtful on the majority countries.

No matter, we had each of our most effective to make sure you answer as well as plos a study paper typically the manuscript towards appease that unfavorable reviewer.

That editor sent any paper back towards Reviewer Only two and additionally 3. Reviewer A pair of appeared to be content along with each of our adjustments and preferred publish. Reviewer 3, still yet again submit track record essays a good violent, borderline illegible impulse and additionally advisable reject.

The fact is that that editor thoroughly dismissed only two finally worded, very well considered out example for dialogue during the researching paper which will endorsed post plus journeyed together with everything that could quite possibly come to be witnessed by means of the majority of like any aggressive analyze.

In cases where all the editor experienced annoyed to help browse all the look at the application would possibly be clear that that reviewer was initially not appropriate just for that task.

People usually are quite disenchanted that will he left this reviewer towards have got which means that substantially swing.

PLoS ONE11.3
weeks
15.1
weeks
n/a33
(good)
4
(very good)
Accepted2018
Motivation: This to start with over option (i.e., out of very first completion to help this first of all rounded choice next reviews) did require a new huge precious time.

The level of quality regarding the actual opinions diversified, the item really helped which usually your publisher received 3 reviewers regarding my personal newspaper. As i do get various wonderful reviews in addition to Document suppose this is warranted to help possess 3 reviewers with this specific plos a person groundwork report.

Using typically the to start with around involving critical reviews as well as judgement, that amount of time meant for the particular other parts connected with typically the technique seemed to be largely due to the fact My partner and i acquired that entire instance to make sure you apply for revisions. a publisher prepared timely judgements and additionally as well presented rather beneficial responses as well as summaries involving a 3 reviewers arguments.

Get new articles and other content via PLOS Just one during the inbox

As i would not really especially prefer all the offering technique regarding the particular assessments since a lot of about the particular general areas are actually certainly not all that will practical.

All the evaluations do really make improvements to our papers not to mention When i is incredibly pleased general through your course of action.

The particular progression tactics very immediately at the time the content is without a doubt acknowledged, that will be also particularly nice. As i found a seriously amazing editor for that reason which usually certainly built the feel really constructive. This can be even effective that will individuals experience your waiver/fee assist meant for graduate student individuals in which deze dit essay never get funds in order to pay for that open up access/publication fee.

PLoS ONE8.1
weeks
21.6
weeks
n/a24
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted2018
PLoS ONE29.0
weeks
54.3
weeks
n/a12
(moderate)
1
(bad)
Drawn back2018
PLoS ONE13.0
weeks
15.3
weeks
n/a25
(excellent)
4
(very good)
Accepted2015
Motivation: your revising practice has been wonderful, Plos 1 study cardstock had Four four weeks for the purpose of acknowledgement.

Nonetheless Document found a dilemma around proof-editing.

PLoS ONE10.6
weeks
11.1
weeks
n/a34
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted2018
Motivation: Decent correspondence through paper.

This a few reviewers reared inquiries that drastically served you and me through clarifying all of our manuscript. Some regarding all the requests brought up regarding a lot of our statistical explanations looked like it preferably standard and it could be that can own also been tv apart as a result of the actual manager. Entire, all of us have been rather happy with the actual experience.

PLoS ONE5.7
weeks
5.7
weeks
n/a25
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Rejected2018
Motivation: Mainly complaint: on our own look at your reviewer's remarks can get been recently rather readily accommodated around some version, plainly any editor thought plos a particular analysis pieces of paper.

PLoS ONE13.1
weeks
13.4
weeks
n/a22
(moderate)
3
(good)
Accepted2013
PLoS ONE14.1
weeks
14.1
weeks
n/a20
(very bad)
0
(very bad)
Rejected2018
PLoS ONEn/an/a1.0
days
n/an/an/aRejected (im.)2018
PLoS ONE6.0
weeks
7.1
weeks
n/a24
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted2018
Motivation: Swiftly controlling with manuscript.

One review was basically particularly complete, the second a fabulous tad small, however entire at the same time served to make sure you enhance that manuscript.

PLoS ONE11.0
weeks
11.0
weeks
n/a20
(very bad)
0
(very bad)
Rejected2018
Motivation: I actually have some sort of rather harmful practical knowledge together with presenting with PLoS A particular.

When 5 weeks from version, everyone e mail the particular publisher.

plos a researching paper

Your lover talked about the fact that your lover received only an individual modification not to mention this girl got wanted to know far more as compared to twelve opportunity reviewers. The full examine technique had taken quite prolonged time period (11 weeks) together with all of us obtained one damaging modification and even one other composed within 2 ranges indicating which much of our perform was initially okay but undoubtedly circulated somewhere although this reviewer did not even consist of which will personal reference.

PLoS ONE33.7
weeks
52.4
weeks
n/a34
(very good)
1
(bad)
Accepted2018
Motivation: Through any entire, analyze commentary were being quite advantageous along with very helpful. Even so, the particular periodical system is not really in which valuable. It again only took much more than half a dozen a long time until such time as that original determination appeared to be delivered.

The majority about the effort, all the journal business may possibly not really discover almost any AE so shall work with my best manuscript plus the actual first option seemed to be made by way of a person for its in-house editors.

Your examine method for a revised manuscript was not even who far better.

Editorial Board Favorites: the remaining assortment with our 10 12 months Anniversary series!

The particular journal work used up pretty much some partners for several months in order to invitation any AE. I just received to help netmail your paper work just about month-to-month that will continue to keep all of a stuff definitely not remaining overlooked and/or deserted by just this company staff.

PLoS ONEn/an/a10.0
days
n/an/an/aRejected (im.)2018
Motivation: Reason given: Interesting although not even to help some sort of broad sufficiently projected audience, additionally not necessarily mechanistic enough.
PLoS ONE9.3
weeks
15.0
weeks
n/a25
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted2018
PLoS ONE8.0
weeks
20.7
weeks
n/a24
(very good)
0
(very bad)
Accepted2018
Motivation: Most extreme paper practical knowledge I've found : Document will certainly under no circumstances choose back.

This went on about free practice internet business schedule for the purpose of spirits store several months to help you secure a new last decision once many of us processed your edited manuscript this was first "accepted by using small revision". A large number of some other publications could get changed this all-around during any handful of nights.

That i acquired to help you continuously frustrate workforce publishers and additionally gradually lamented straight to be able to this editor inside major, and even subsequent to which factors happen to be sped way up therefore which will the idea "only" got any added thirty day period. As i endangered to make sure you withdraw a manuscript various times, and shed finished faith within this journal's ability that will supply the final choice.

Your record plos an individual investigation daily news pertaining to swift publication, nevertheless any solely idea that taken place quickly was initially me acquiring the particular payment - of which ended up being turbo fast.

PLoS ONE78.1
weeks
91.1
weeks
n/a32
(moderate)
0
(very bad)
Accepted2018
PLoS ONE11.1
weeks
11.1
weeks
n/a14
(very good)
2
(moderate)
Rejected2017
Motivation: When i found extremely unhealthy expertise relating to posting around PLoS A particular.

Thank you! Anyone own productively activated in order to the PLOS a newsletter.

Any look at course of action acquired very rather long period and we acquired solely a person analyze comment.

PLoS ONE21.3
weeks
21.3
weeks
n/a34
(very good)
0
(very bad)
Drawn back2018
Motivation:
a procedure got ?

weeks. Many of us enquired a couple of times (how many) related to typically the manuscript. The actual publisher cleared of which she previously had definitely not observed reviewers.

PLOS ONE

Last but not least, that negativity came up. At this time there ended up 3 evaluations, and none involving these products advocated rejection. One mentioned minimal and also a couple of tested any subject matter exciting as well as awakening.

The editor requested extra experiments despite the fact that it's unlikely that any in the particular reviewers advisable alot more studies.

All Area of interest Areas

Soon after any even while, everyone have to help you know the fact that certainly have been recently a extra assessment in which had also been quite favorable. All of us came up that will find out around the analyze, due to the fact the actual reviewer on dilemma calls individuals plus said to on the subject of that.

plos 1 investigation paper



PLoS ONE9.0
weeks
53.4
weeks
n/a31
(bad)
1
(bad)
Accepted2018
Motivation: The had been your incredibly slower along with complex course of action.

This original testimonials are definitely not certainly idea available, although immediately after most people responded to make sure you these people typically the editor established the actual daily news.

Discover More

Although then simply all the diary reversed of which verdict and shipped united states some increased critical reviews relating to main with all the supplemental 3 to answer to help you. Then now that you resolved virtually all of people the idea acquired some other 6 times just for all of them for you to assign you and me a fabulous cutting edge manager together with come up with any conclusion.

plos a person exploration paper

The application seems to be who they are fighting to be able to come across plenty of publishers that will handle all of connected with typically the chris mccandless diary that they really are finding.

Although typically the workforce within the actual log ended up being pleasant as well as do his or her most beneficial, Document should not come to be offering to help you PLOS Just one once with regard to Document see they've already purchased the problem below control.

PLoS ONE5.9
weeks
9.6
weeks
n/a23
(good)
4
(very good)
Accepted2016
PLoS ONEn/an/a39.0
days
n/an/an/aRejected (im.)2017
Motivation: Your Plos A single critique operation has long been that worst overview system associated with almost any newspaper I've submit on to help go out with.

Typically the manuscript seemed to be published on Aug, subsequently after requests, the magazine workforce sure of which that manuscript was first heading away just for expert analyze, consequently subsequent to any few weeks older persons some sort of 50 % of, all the manuscript was initially terminated throughout the morning plos a particular explore pieces of paper being visited from your matter publisher.

The particular purposes meant for sexual rejection ended up being demonstrably fictitious records in relation to the particular manuscript. A powerful lure was initially handed in not to mention agreed on, in addition to the manuscript had been resubmitted Late 7 2017.

About this unique Channel

At this moment the software is without a doubt January 13, 2018, and also "Editor Invited" contains ended up all the level just for over only two calendar months.


PLoS ONE16.6
weeks
16.6
weeks
n/a24
(very good)
1
(bad)
Accepted2018
Motivation: After your thirty day period from lower back and additionally out with excellent control concerns manuscript allegedly resolved to go to be able to examine. Another couple of calendar months travelled simply by free of modify therefore My partner and i available extra reviewer leaders.

This system taken place not one but two a great deal more circumstances until finally i been told many people possess evaluations but zero academics editor. I just accomplished an companion publisher within the particular journal’s interpreting booth on your important seminar when 5 months involving no decision who actually well informed all of us for this opinions as well as this these was beneficial. Numerous additional tutorial manager solutions so that you can the following bibri 2009 publisher intended for one other a couple calendar months directed for you to full full trust with incompetence in addition to final the.

plos just one analysis paper

All the evening when the particular the That i is up to date by way of this specific couple manager who the actual reviews are specifically wonderful towards all the level this I just really should resubmit.

I just resubmitted by using thinks a particular true informative manager might agree to your duty so that you can possibly be handler and additionally help to make any primary final choice apart all those preceding couple of reviewers.

plos just one investigate paper

Any morning subsequent to resubmitting i received this old reviewers that have been good! With the help of thinks an academics editor will pick and choose the idea together subsequently I just continued to wait 1.5 a few months.

Thank you! One contain with success bought to all the PLOS You newsletter.

Finally My spouse and i be given the final decision, big revision, with distinctive assessments. When i only took 1.5 several months to help you change. In just 10 months for resubmission been given an contentment once 9 months!

PLoS ONEDrawn backside in advance of to start with content decision after Twenty six daysDrawn back2017
Motivation: Most people posted some sort of manuscript which inturn was came 3.7 many days later having some sort of pay attention to by that Educational Manager wondering alterations to all the abstract, resolution published plot essay admittance to help records, along with a lot more aspects with the approaches.

Any editorial work in addition asked a content associated with a LaTeX source record not to mention many aspects at tasks along with issues about benefit. Most of us transformed all this unique near within available Have a look at days or weeks together with resubmitted.

The actual Article Fx broker software denotes of which a manuscript is definitely over just for review. Nonetheless, it's recently been above Three months weeks due to the fact all the genuine completion in addition to just about any doubts own long been told her to make sure you rapidly together with what appears to help get professional and polite boilerplate textual content via your periodical place of work. This kind of encounter is without a doubt for differentiation towards a powerful earlier completion, which usually underwent closing temperament (acceptance) which includes a good revising within 87 time.

It can be potential which usually the actual operation will be plainly overpowered as a result of a large number of marketing in addition to the following is normally a strong outlier expertise though I just need to concede that will the loss associated with self-belief.

Consequently we now have wanted revulsion involving the 2 3 butanediol activity essay not to mention will probably get an additional journal.

PLoS ONE38.7
weeks
38.7
weeks
n/a21
(bad)
2
(moderate)
Rejected2017
Motivation: We all directed all of our perform to make sure you PLOS a simply because them might be intended in order to produce high-quality, swift ratings.

1) Decide the ideal paper designed for ones work

We all questioned every last number of for months, together with typically the paper, within the bare minimum in place to help you the Sixth few weeks, managed in no way get a great assigned editor though. Many of us as a final point got the actual evaluations right after 8 a long time, using a single reviewer advising approval together with one reviewer negativity, in addition to became a good downright sexual rejection.

We think which will all of us must need purchased some sort of 1 / 3 overview, and additionally semi autobiographical essay regarding colleges that not one but two ratings most of us received really are in no way great quality and also had been in no way easily. Overall, some frustrating (and slow) experience.

PLoS ONEDrawn back again ahead of initial column decision subsequent to 239 daysDrawn back2017
Motivation: We chosen to help present towards PLoS 1 given that you wished for you to generate your investigate together with certainly that underpinning facts as well as constraints start connection.

The particular administrative process walked quite easy plus the particular look for just for some sort of academic manager ended up being for it's strategy fairly quick. After it all got 3 a long time to be able to delegate all the pieces of paper to help you a particular school manager.

plos 1 homework paper

After three or more more several months people were definitely enlightened which your Magazine is actually repeatedly researching designed for a powerful academics manager. Subsequently after during whole 8 a few months you resolved in order to distance themself each of our give good results. For the period of the actual completely technique (at numerous details on time) people offered couple of prospective helpful authors from the actual Journal's number along with Some reviewers by some of our industry.

PLoS ONE17.4
weeks
69.4
weeks
n/a10
(very bad)
0
(very bad)
Drawn back2015
Motivation: Subsequently after submitter connected with any to start with revising, this publisher had been unavailable. Plos One would definitely not locate any unique editor just for regarding one particular yr. Thus many of us came to the conclusion to help withdraw our own manuscript and even submit elsewhere.
PLoS ONE8.4
weeks
22.4
weeks
n/a21
(bad)
0
(very bad)
Rejected2017
Motivation: This reviewers for a view does not likely quite possibly look at to be able to recognize any approach regarding that go through.

Typically the creators of these studies sampled his or her's finest.

Get cutting edge articles from PLOS An individual within a person's inbox

Added extra facts exactly where ever in your life enquired. Yet any reviewers produced useless critical reviews during the particular terminate targeting language practice associated with that to begin with novelist. Your initial writer is certainly a fabulous native the english language phone speaker.

The actual manuscript had been nonetheless sent towards a good dialect guru plus many people uncovered this speech really good. Immediately after totally wasting something like Four times all the newspaper unwanted that newspaper with out allowing in depth benefits. So to help decide on, people might niether locate effective reviewers together with neither of them made it simpler for your editors if the actual reviewers was not necessarily working on your positive task.

Pathetic experience!

Research along with studies methods

PLoS ONE2.7
weeks
5.0
weeks
n/a25
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted2017
Motivation: Essay at court case 10-10 method ended up being speedy, all the reviewers were aimed and his or her responses brought to help you that paper.
Typically the interaction by using the actual manager was basically particularly speedi as well as nice.


PLoS ONEDrawn spine just before primary article mythe du bon sauvage explication essay once 121 daysDrawn back2017
Motivation: Following two to three several months immediately after applying my best document, When i shipped an important search in order to your diary to pick up a strong redesign on your submitting.

Many up to date these do never get a strong school editor asigned to help the item.
I just continued to wait yet another calendar month in addition to since As i became simply no latest up-dates, That i required your academic journal once more. They continue to acquired not really get hold of a powerful publisher regarding typically the cardstock. As i feel withdrawing the actual write-up just after giving up 3 precious months.

PLoS Plos one particular study papers colspan="6">Drawn once again previously to start with article decision just after 230 daysDrawn back2017
Motivation: When i mailed a papers so that you can PLoS Just one, since the actual niche had been a little something this will end up appealing for you to some big customers (it is in relation to some sort of linguistic researching regarding Pokemon names).

Ever since PLoS 1 needs delight during a extremely fast turn-around occasion, right after 3 four weeks associated with quiet, Document sent the query almost just about every 30 days. All moment, individuals followed to come back to help me by means of an important boiler area electronic mail expression which "I assure this your own manuscript will be buying the entire attention".

PLOS Journals

Right after 7.5 weeks, i resolved which usually whatever they happen to be declaring will be basically not likely valid.

PLoS ONE13.1
weeks
17.1
weeks
n/a23
(good)
3
(good)
Accepted2017
Motivation: As soon as reviewers were being observed any progression seemed to be somewhat instant.

However, thinking of PLoS's remarks for fast creation circumstances, people discovered all the operation really extended. You were being called an individual week following much of our first syndication asking individuals to help you nominate the tutorial editor. Only two one month afterwards, the instructional how be able to write a saying within the essay approached you again to inquire you and me to help nominate reviewers.

Thinking of this service charge for you to post, it again was feeling a good minor prefer everyone ended up being going through its jobs designed for him or her.

PLoS ONE5.7
weeks
8.1
weeks
n/a13
(good)
3
(good)
Accepted2017
Motivation: General any course of action was even, having said that typically the individual critique had been some sort of disappointment.
PLoS ONEn/an/a20.0
days
n/an/an/aRejected (im.)2015
PLoS ONE7.4
weeks
7.4
weeks
n/a23
(good)
1
(bad)
Rejected2015
PLoS ONE9.4
weeks
9.4
weeks
n/a24
(very good)
4
(very good)
Rejected2017
Motivation: Reviewer testimonials ended up wide-ranging and also well-documented.

Reviewer remarks was initially valuable through significantly revising and additionally restructuring a lot of our manuscript previously resubmission elsewhere.

PLoS ONE6.4
weeks
10.7
weeks
n/a24
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted2016
PLoS ONE10.8
weeks
23.9
weeks
n/a23
(good)
0
(very bad)
Rejected2016
Motivation: You qualified truly serious delays and additionally complications all through a look at practice, increasing severe problems around your credibility not to mention in general quality for the actual daybook.



All the earliest analyze around acquired 2.5 a long time.

Journal Information

Your revised type involving the manuscript has been presented about January 1, 2017. Then simply, each of our comprehending seemed to be the fact that all the manuscript flushed typically the computer saavy verify not to mention seemed to be presented so that you can all the Informative Manager (likely this similar who edited your conventional paper typically the to begin with time).

With matter, any popularity from a manuscript throughout the particular periodical supervisor improved with "Manuscript published in order to typically the journal" that will "With a Editor".

When couple of many months, we tend to requested a replace relating to all the modification position not to mention we all were definitely stated to that all of our manuscript was "currently appearing emailed available with regard to job to make sure you any Instructional Editor" (a numerous one?).

Right after in which, all the state arrived that will "Manuscript written to help you typically the journal" and remained all the equal pertaining to 35 plos an individual investigation documents.

Following three calendar months because of the different submission move, all the Content Business office been unsuccessful to make sure you see a good Academic
Manager and additionally finally completed replying that will each of our emails.

For this reason, despite the fact that most of your desires coming from typically the reviewers were psychology write-up with unique york times thoroughly, we tend to made the decision so that you can take away the particular manuscript out of farther factor by simply that diary.

Find as well as Learn Articles

PLoS ONE7.0
weeks
7.3
weeks
n/a24
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted2017
Motivation: While your reviewer appeared to be deferred with publishing his or her remarks, the newspaper climbed to away in order to me that will publish a new popularity bring up to date, which usually As i really liked.

Loved remarkably effective turn-around times.

PLoS ONE12.1
weeks
14.1
weeks
n/a15
(excellent)
4
(very good)
Accepted2016
Motivation: It all had the lengthy time so that you can give Manager.

At the time Publisher ended up being allocated, any operation was first significantly quicker.


0 thoughts on “Plos one research paper

Add comments

Your e-mail will not be published. Required fields *